Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1990 (9) TMI 83

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lia manufacture insulating enamels, varnishes and resins for electrical industry in the factory at Pimpri, Pune. The petitioners manufacture a product known as 'Insulation Adhesive P80'. The adhesive is obtained by dissolving duty paid polyvinyl alcohol powder in water. The petitioners classified the manufacture of adhesive under Tariff Item No. 15(1) (i) of the First Schedule to the Central Excis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... law. The petitioners thereupon forwarded revised classification list dated March 12, 1980, to the Assistant Collector. The revised classification list was approved by the Assistant Collector on September 20, 1980. The petitioners thereafter on September 30, 1980 sought refund of duty wrongly paid for the period commencing from March 12, 1980 to September 30, 1980. The claim was granted by the Asst .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iew taken by the Asstt. Collector holding that the claim is barred by Rule 11 is not correct. The learned counsel submitted that even otherwise, the defence of limitation is not available to the department in a proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, when the duty was paid by the assessee under a mistake of law. By catena of decisions of this Court and of the Supreme Court, it is settle .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Court in New India Industries Ltd. v. Union of India (1990 (46) E.L.T. 23) that the writ Court is required to satisfy that the tax burden is in fact shifted by the assessee to others and an order of refund would result in unjust enrichment. It is undoubtedly true that in accordance with the Full Bench decision, it is necessary for the Court to ascertain whether the tax burden has been shifted by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... xed as exhibit 'L' to the petition, is set aside and proceedings are remitted back to the Asstt. Collector for determination of amount of refund payable. The Asstt. Collector should complete the process and refund the duty on or before December 31, 1990. In case the Asstt. Collector fails to do so, then the department will be liable to pay interest on the amount of duty repayable at the rate of 15 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates