Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (9) TMI 1681

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to the limited extent of examining as to whether payment made by the assessee to its foreign entity towards use of overall ICT infrastructure was chargeable to tax in the latter's hands in terms of the Double Tax Avoidance Agreement between India and Netherlands ('the DTAA'). 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case relevant for our purpose are that the assessee made payment to its wholly owned company Vanderlande Industries Holding, B.V. Netherlands (hereinafter also called "VIBV") amounting to Rs. 53,53,204/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that no deduction of tax at source was made. He held that such amount was chargeable to tax in the hands of the recipient and in the absence of assessee having deducted tax at source, the amount .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the amount within the definition of 'Royalties' in the hands of the recipient. It was noticed that para 4(b) of the amended Article 12 covered payment of any kind received for use of industrial, commercial or scientific equipment. In the light of this para of the Notification, the Tribunal held that the case of the assessee was caught in Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA making the amount taxable in the hands of the recipient requiring deduction of tax at source. 5. The assessee moved rectification application contending that while considering the amendment to Article 12(4)(b) by means of Notification No.11050, dt. 30-08-1999, the Tribunal considered only Para (III) which was effective from 01-04-1997 and omitted to consider Para (VI) which wa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hich was contained in the same notification itself in Para (VI), redefining para 4 of Article 12, omitting clause (b) of the original para 4. We have examined Para (VI) of the Notification dated 30-08-1999, effective from April 1, 1998, reading as under : "4. The term 'royalties' as used in this article means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematograph films, any patent, trademark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience." 8. On a perusal of the amendment to Article 12(4) of the DTAA effective from 01-04-1998, it is clear that the term .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the AO for examining the position of the DTAA prevailing for the assessment year under consideration and then deciding the issue by treating the amount paid by the assessee as a consideration for use of the overall Infrastructure facility of VIBV. In other words, if the amending notification dated 30-08-1999 is the last notification, in that situation, the case will fall under Para (VI) and not Para (III), making the amount not chargeable to tax in the hands of VIBV. In the otherwise scenario, the AO will examine the effect of such further amendments, if any, to Article 12(4) to the DTAA for deciding the issue in the right perspective. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates