Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (4) TMI 762

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... taken up together for hearing and disposal. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants were issued with show-cause notices, inter alia, demanding service tax of Rs.42,76,703/- and Rs.3,18,625/- on GTA service received by them during the period 01.01.2005 to 31.03.2010 with interest and penalty. On adjudication, the demands have been confirmed. Hence, the present appeals. 3.1. At the outset, the learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that the appellant is a Government company fully owned by Government of Karnataka. The activities of the appellant are governed as per Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission's guidelines for their day-to-day functions. During the said period .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ] iii. Sumangalam Suitings (I) Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur-II [2010(19) STR 809 (Tri. Del.)] iv. R.K. Gupta Vs. CCE, Raipur [2018(6) TMI 1434-CSTAT, NEW DELHI] 3.2. Further, the learned advocate has submitted that the basic requirement for levy of service tax in the present case has not been satisfied inasmuch as no consignment note has been issued for transportation of the goods by the vendors to the appellant; hence confirmation of demand of service tax under GTA service is bad in law. In support, they have referred the following judgments:- i. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. CCE, Raipur [2017(47) STR 93 (Tri. Del.)] ii. Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. CCE&ST, Jamshedupur [2024(10) TMI 1062-CESTAT KOLKATA] iii. Northern Coal Field Ltd. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... force during the relevant period reads as: Section 65(50b): "goods transport agency" means any person who provides service in relation to transport of goods by road and issues consignment note, by whatever name called; Rule 2(d) "person responsible for collecting the service tax" means - (i) in relation to a telephone connection - (a) the Director General of Posts and Telegraphs, referred to in clause (6) of section 3 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (13 of 1885); or (b) the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd., Delhi, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); or (c) any other person who has been granted a licence by the Central Government under the first proviso to sub-section (1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... person to render goods transport service should be an agency meant exclusively for providing goods transport service by whatever means and for the purpose, he should be issuing a consignment note. None of the criteria is met by the appellant in the present case. We are of the firm opinion that the order under challenge qua confirming GTA Service Tax liability is not sustainable. The argument of ld. DR that the charges of rate are shown separately in the invoice are of no relevance for the purpose in view of the apparent fact that the amount of money paid by the appellant was the price for the Gitti purchased by them, that too on FOR basis, for the said Gitti to be delivered from the site of purchase to the site of the appellant. Irrespecti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates