2025 (4) TMI 1273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Amiya R. Das & Ms. Unnatii Thakkar i/b. SPCM Legal, Advocates,. For the Respondents: Mr. Suresh Kumar i/b. Ms. Smita Thakur, Advocate,. P. C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this case is to the Assessment Order dated 29.05.2024. The Petitioner has also challenged the Show Cause Notices based upon which the Assessment Order was ultimately issued. 3. There are .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 5. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that Appellate Authorities take a long time to deal with the Appeals. He pointed out that the Appellate Authorities or the Authorities under the Act, by relying upon CBDT circulars normally require deposit of 20% of the tax demand as a pre-condition for interim relief pending the Appeal. This demand notice has also been suppressed by the Petitioner. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cern no adequate notice or no sufficient opportunity. This would require investigation into factual aspects. No extra ordinary circumstances have been shown to deviate from the normal rule requiring exortion of alternate efficacious remedies. 8. In Oberoi Constructions Limited vs. Union of India, W. P. No. 33260 of 2023 decided on 11.11.2024, we have considered several decisions on the issue of e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X