9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (4) TMI 1260X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titioner : Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Raj Awasthi, Adv., Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR, Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv., Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv., Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv., Ms. Maulshree Pathak, Adv., Ms. Meenakshi Vimal, Adv., Mr. V. Madhukar, Adv., Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR, Ms. Monisha Handa, Adv., Mr. Rajul Shrivastav, Adv., Mr. Anubhav Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Kharde, S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sides. Upon hearing the learned counsel and on perusing the materials on record, we find that the question which was already referred to a larger Bench, as per the judgment in "Manju Surana vs. Sunil Arora & Ors." (2018) 5 SCC 557, is involved in this case as well. 2. The question referred under the judgment in Manju Surana's case (supra) is whether, while directing an investigation in terms of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eferred to larger Bench on 27.3.2018. Considering the fact that question involved is a matter of relevance and such issues arises frequently for consideration before Courts, we are of the considered view that an earlier decision on the question referred is solicited.
5. Registry is directed to place these matters before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
