Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (4) TMI 1529

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 12.01.2023 passed by the High Court of Madras in Crl. O.P. (MD) 21417 of 2016 and Crl. O.P. (MD) No. 10979 of 2016, whereby the High Court dismissed the appellant's petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) to quash the chargesheet and consequential proceedings arising out of CC. No. 308 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Tirunelveli. 3. The case of the prosecution in the instant matter is that the first accused was working as a Branch Manager in HDFC Limited at Palayankottai Branch and the second accused, i.e. the appellant herein, was working as a Manager in the Head Office of HDFC Limited at Thiruvananthapuram when the alleged offence was committed. In 2004, one Mr. A. Kannan had bor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h Tirunelveli under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. Accordingly, FIR in Crime No. 21/2014 was registered on 15.07.2014 under Sections 197, 417, 418, 467, 468 and 420 of the IPC wherein the Branch Manager, Tirunelveli was arrayed as the first accused and the appellant herein was arrayed as the second accused. It was alleged in the FIR that the accused persons, by suppressing the acquisition of the property by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, sold the property to the de-facto complainant in the public auction and, thereby, cheated her. After completion of the investigation, chargesheet was filed against the accused persons and the Judicial Magistrate No. I, Tirunelveli has also taken cognizance of the final report in CC. No. 308 of 2016. 7. Aggrieved .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion process and issuance of the sale certificate took place in 2012. At the relevant time, he was only serving as an Assistant Manager and it was solely the Manager who was authorized to initiate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. Rule 2(a) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 defined authorized officer as follows: ""authorized officer" means an officer not less than a chief manager of a public sector bank or equivalent, as specified by the Board of Directors of Board of Trustees of the secured creditor or any other person or authority exercising powers of superintendence, direction and control of the business or affairs of the secured creditor, as the case may be, to exercise the rights of a secured creditor under the [Act .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e contrary, the respondent no. 1 has submitted that the complainant was completely unaware of the fact that the said property was already acquired by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board and only when she went to the Sub- Registrar to register the property, she was informed that it was already acquired by the Housing Board in 2003. Therefore, despite taking all reasonable care, it would have been impossible for the complainant to know about this acquisition which was not disclosed to the complainant, neither at the time of the auction nor at the time of payment of consideration. 15. It was further contended by the respondent that the appellant herein cannot take the plea that the said auction was done on the basis of the condition of "as is what i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ber, 2014. Therefore, it becomes clear as day that the appellant had no role to play in the transaction leading to the FIR as he was not a signatory to the sale certificate. Since the appellant was neither the authorized officer at the relevant time nor responsible for the auction process or issuance of the sale certificate, the allegations against him are baseless and do not attract criminal liability. The continuation of the instant criminal proceedings against the appellant shall lead to abuse of process of law, cause nothing but miscarriage of justice and inordinately harass the appellant who has been implicated without due cause. 19. Accordingly, in light of the above discussion, the appeals are allowed and the impugned order is set a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates