Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1992 (11) TMI 103

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tioner which is pending disposal with the respondents. According to the petitioner he is eligible for the total amount of refund claim of Rs. 97,256.25 under Notification No. 132/82 and for Rs. 5,73,390.00 under Notification No. 135/83. However, it is admitted that out of the same amount the amount of Rs. 40,791.15 and Rs. 4,42,724.00 have already been refunded to the petitioner, the petitioner is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .25 as aforesaid. This includes 1415 quintals on brown sugar. Since petitioner did not observe the procedure, as such their claim was examined on the basis of last come and first go and the rebate was allowed at the rate applicable to the levy sugar. So far as free sale sugar is concerned, no rebatable sugar was cleared. Further ..... quintals was not cleared but the rebate was allowed at the exis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion which says that amount of exemption, calculated at the rate specified in columns 2 3 of the table shall not exceed the amount of duty of excise payable on free sale sugar or levy sugar. Hence no amount under the captioned notification is pending payment to the petitioner. Similarly in Paragraph 19 of the counter-affidavit it has further been stated that there is no amount pending payment ex .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unter-affidavit that the petitioner has not followed certain procedure. However, we are not concerned in this case regarding the merits of the order passed which according to the counter-affidavit has already been disposed of. If the petitioner is aggrieved by means of any order passed for refund on file merits of the same, there is a remedy to the petitioner to the appeal under Section 35 of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the present proceeding to go into the same. However, in case the averment made in paragraph 6 of the rejoinder affidavit shows that attestation has been made according to law, then if it is pending as admitted in paragraph 7 of the counter-affidavit, may be disposed of, in case there is such an attestation within a period of six weeks of the presentation of a certified copy of our order passed t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates