1994 (8) TMI 42

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te Tribunal, New Delhi has dismissed the petitioner's application for stay of the recovery of demand during the pendency of appeal. The reason for the dismissal of the application was that the appellant was absent, its application for adjournment on the ground of counsel being unable to attend, was rejected. The stay application was dismissed for want of prosecution. In the present writ petition, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... want of prosecution after rejecting an adjournment application. It is open to the petitioner to move a fresh application for stay of the demand. In my view, therefore, there is no cause for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. 3.A certifed copy of this order may be supplied to the learned counsel on payment of usual charges today. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X