Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1994 (12) TMI 90

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and sentenced to undergo sentence of various rigorous imprisonments and fine, as stated in detail in paragraph hereinafter. 2.To briefly narrate few relevant facts of the case  as far as they are necessary to determine the question involved regarding the quantum for the enhancement of the sentence, it may be stated that on the basis of the secret information received that a Singapore registered merchant vessel, viz., "M. V. Pacific Gembira" carrying wooden logs to Kandla (India) had on board a very large quantity of silver and other contraband goods which will be off-loaded by it before reaching the destination, the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Bombay requested the Coast-Guard ship, viz. "Vijaya" to intercept the said vessel, viz., M. V. Pacific Gembira". Acting on this tip-off, on 19-5-1991, the Coast-Guard ship viz., "Vijaya" intercepted the said vessel in the mid-sea between Okha and Porbandar and was taken to Kandla Port on 20-5-1991 for necessary search and investigation. The DIR authorities thereafter rummaged the said vessel and ultimately as per the information received they were able to recover on the end of 9th day, the silver of foreign m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t. Offences U/s. 1203 of the I.P.C.     (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Wong Ah Boo R.I. for 2 years & fine of Rs. 2000 R.I. for 2 years and fine of Rs. 2000/- R.I. for one year and fine of Rs. 1000 R.I. for one for Rs. 5000/- Asmy Firmanto -do- -do- -do- -do-   Sumhadi Bin Moaris R.I. for 5 years & fine Rs. 5000 R.I. for 5 years & fine of Rs. 3000/- R.I. for 1 year & fine of Rs. 2000 R.I. for one forRupees 10,000/-. 3.That the complainant feeling that the impugned  order of sentence passed against the respondent-accused was comparatively unduly lenient has challenged the same before this Court by preferring the present appeal for enhancement of sentence. Similarly, out of three accused persons, Sumhadi Bin Maoris feeling aggrieved by the impugned order of sentence of five years and fine of Rs. 10,000/- in all, as quite harsh and excessive went in appeal before the Sessions Court, Kachchh, at Bhuj, which came to be numbered there as Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 1993. When the appeal for the enhancement of sentence preferred by the original complainant was called out last week, at the joint request of the learned Advocates appearing for the respe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or similar offence in future; and (v) that it was under sheer unfortunate compulsion of life that he has become the victim of the conspiracy of circumstances to be involved in the commission of the crime alleged against him, on the basis of which comparatively lenient view was taken by the trial Court can be said to be special and adequate reasons to impose sentence less than the minimum prescribed. According to Mr. Mehta, no doubt the learned Magistrate has imposed substantive sentence of imprisonment for some years and some amount of fine, but at the same time, taking into consideration the extreme gravity and seriousness of the offences highlighted above, the same cannot be said to be commensurate with the alleged offences against the accused persons, and accordingly, merely because the accused pleaded guilty that by itself was hardly a ground for the learned Magistrate to unnecessarily feel obliged and to impose a sentence less than the minimum prescribed under the Act so far as the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, and sentence of only five years and some fine so far as the respondent No. 3 was concerned. On the basis of these submissions, Mr. Mehta finally urged that se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i Bin Maoris having already undergone additional imprisonment of 18 months and in all for as many as 42 months, while Asmi Firmanto has undergone the additional imprisonment of 40 months and 15 days, this additional period of sentence may be treated as enhancement of sentence and all the three accused be accordingly released forthwith as having undergone the period of enhanced sentences 6.Now having heard the Learned Counsels for the  respective parties quite at length, it may be stated at the very outset that the submissions made by the learned Special Senior P. P. Mr. Mehta have a considerable force and hence the same deserve to be accepted. It is indeed no doubt true that all the three respondents have pleaded guilty and on the basis of the same only, the impugned order of conviction and sentence came to be passed. It is equally further true that awarding of sentence is essentially a matter of trial Court's discretion and the same should not ordinarily be interfered with, unless it is found to be grossly inadequate and manifestly unjust. But then to this general principle, there is one exception, viz. that when the statute itself prescribes the minimum sentence, the trial .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rate reeling under the acute unnerving pressure of backlog of cases exploiting his weakness or greed for the quick disposal and thereby succumbing him to easy course of throwing away the cases with the lighter sentences to the liking of accused persons? Ninthly, could it be the fact that whenever the accused finds himself in a tight corner and accordingly difficult to come out from the clutches of the law, that is to say, roughs, toughs and rigours of the impending prolonged trial, conviction and sentence, he was bound to cleverly prefer low-profile before the learned Magistrate and in that methodical proceed dramatically tamming himself down pleads guilty to get away with the lighter possible sentence and walk out of the Court with a mischievious wink in one eye and the smile in his cheek ! ! Tenthly, that in such type of smuggling cases under the Customs Act these days the complaints are filed at quite a belated stage, and therefore, by the time the charge is framed, the accused as an under-trial prisoner languishes in jail for quite a long period. In a given case, even for more than two to three years! Under the circumstances, by the time the charge is framed, the accused many a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e present one was inclinded to impose maximum possible sentence of imprisonment and fine on accused pleading guilty, he should be asked to do so by filing clear-cut written purshis to the said effect. Seventeenthly, after carefully screening and examining the aforesaid factors, if the learned Magistrate was prima facie of the view to accept the plea of guilty and as a result of the same was further inclined to give a lighter sentence, then to carefully visualize as to what indeed could be the possible fall-outs of the lighter sentence, viz. on (i) the legislative policy, the object underlying that particular Act, and thereby ultimately upon the respect and honour of that Law; (ii) the morale of the law enforcing agency (in the instant case, the Customs Officers); (iii) his own image as a Magistrate, and (iv) the overall credibility, i.e., the faith of people in the Administration of Justice !! It may once again be re-emphasized that merely because the accused pleads guilty that by itself does not warrant or mean that the learned Magistrate should accept the same at its face value. The reason is, if the plea of guilty is blindly and mechanically accepted, then in gross cases like .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e also while entertaining the plea of guilty and thereafter accepting the same and passing the impugned order of sentence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Magistrate ought not to have been oblivious to the following glaring facts constituting the extreme gravity and seriousness of the offence and some of the pertinent observations of the Supreme Court and the High Court made in the said regard such as (i) the accused were foreigners; (ii) the muddamal contraband goods confiscated were silver, VCRs, etc., of foreign make worth more than Rupees six and half crores seized from the foreign vessel where accused on their own statements under Section 108 of the Customs Act were involved, which but for the secret tip-off would not have been caught at all; (iii) that the experience of last several years to the effect that the nefarious anti-social smuggling and espionage activities quite clandestinely were alarmingly on increase, had become rampant and unabatedly going on, on large scale in the vast coastal areas, more particularly in Kachchh & Saurashtra areas which are highly sensitive zones being at a whispering distance from hostile Pakistan, seriou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ople is difficult to comprehend. It is unnecessary to fall on the shoulders of such an offender and join him in the sobbing. When Parliament (which represents the will of the people) views these offences with gravity and alarm one cannot be excused for projecting one's own philosophy to the contrary and in virtually nullifying the will of the Parliament by refusing to faithfully enforce the law. Misplaced sympathy in such matters shakes the faith of people in the judicial system and tarnishes its image. Merely because big smugglers hide behind the skirt of these small operators or linkman and the big guns escape these offenders cannot be treated with ultra and uncalled for sympathy. The big operators cannot operate if the small operators do not extend their willing hand. The chain has to be broken and a sentence which would deter the particular offender as also those who are like-minded must be imposed (State of Gujarat v. Manharlal Ambalal Soni, (1976) XVII GLR 427). 8.Thus taking into consideration the facts and  circumstances of the case, there is indeed no doubt that the learned Magistrate has failed to operate on the above listed judicial frequencies and thereby clearly .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e a Watchman on the gate could be given a slip by persuading to take lighter view that they were tempted to plead guilty in order to get away with the lighter sentence and accordingly, it was here perhaps that the learned Magistrate has walked into the trap thinking that sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment and some fine would meet the ends of justice forgetting altogether that on the coastal lines and on [border] areas of India with Pakistan such offences regularly go on with the help of the fifth columnist of the country and soft sentencing is nothing but taming, encouraging and providing shelter to offender of such offences to play with the country's life. Mind well, if in our country the law and order situation if it has started gradually deteriorating as alleged, and further still if the law also has started losing its respect, it is neither only because of any inadequacy or inefficiency of law nor further more because of only inefficiency, and in a given case corruption in the law enforcing agencies but it is perhaps more because at times, the over charitable, unconcerned relaxed attitude and approach of the Courts in seeing on the one hand the case of the accused in i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e  sentence, this Court is indeed quite conscious of three paramount principles governing the sentencing process. Firstly, the sentence is essentially a matter of trial Court discretion and unless the same is grossly inadequate and manifestly unjust, the Appellate Court should not lightly interfere with the same. Secondly, the sentence should always be commensurate with the gravity of the offences, and thirdly, the underlying twin object of the penology, namely, that on the one hand order of sentence should be deterrent enough to deter the accused from attempting same or similar offences in future and also on the other hand to serve as an object lesson to the person having similar modus operandi to commit the crime alleged. Now bearing in mind these three principles it indeed cannot be said that the sentence awarded can be said to be in commensurate with the extreme gravity and seriousness of the offence. In fact, in the light of the circumstances highlighted above, the gravity and seriousness of the offence is manifestly extreme to such an extent that sentence imposed by the trial Court in the opinion of this Court undoubtedly is unduly lenient and manifestly unjust! Not onl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . When such is the glaring position, are we to take that merely because kingpins are away, person actually involved in heinous activities of smuggling should be let off lightly under one pretext/excuse of the other in the name of so-called "mercy" and "judicial discretion"? No doubt, the Courts of Law while doing justice [are] of course bound to know Law, but when it comes to the real application and interpretation of law to the facts, the judicial vision should be clear enough with two eyes, namely, one of the sound common sense and second of judicial conscience and concern for the common man and the overall national interest. If these two eyes are or even any one of the two are shut down, no law which is primarily enacted for the protection and welfare of the people at large can ever bring about the desired result - justice worth the name to the community for which it is enacted. While considering the plea of mercy by accused, the Courts are bound to know and understand that mercy does not mean mercy to the accused alone, even the Society, community as a whole which is sufferer at the hands of these accused persons have also just claims on the Court for claiming "Justice". Thus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and seriousness of the offences, the Court intends to impose the maximum sentence, then in such type of cases if the accused pleads guilty, it is the foremost duty of the Court in the first instance, to point out to the accused that - look here even if you plead guilty, the Court is not going to take a lenient view of the matter by imposing sentence less than the statutory minimum, and in the second instance, in case of extreme offence, where it is inclined to impose maximum sentence, the Court must disclose its mind as to for what maximum period - years of RI and fine it intends to impose. The consequences of accused pleading guilty must be told point blank in advance before accepting the same, as it would be simply unjust and unfair to take accused by surprise by imposing statutory minimum or maximum sentence as provided under the Act on their pleading guilty to the charge. To do so would be springing surprise and shock to the accused hitting him below the belt. It is not at all difficult to imagine that when the accused pleads guilty, he is tempted to plead so taking that by pleading guilty, the Court would be merciful and he would be left off with a lighter sentence. Such impr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates