9911796707
TMI Blog1995 (2) TMI 81X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or final disposal. 2. The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the order of the third respondent, dated 31-1-1992 and that of the second respondent, dated 14-2-1992 and to forbear the respondents from demanding interest from the petitioner on the payment of the differential excise duty in instalments. The petitioner Company is manufacturing cement. They had ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in instalments at the rate of Rupees Five lakhs per month. The respondents have now chosen, by the impugned orders, to claim interest for the differential amount at the rate of 17.50 per cent. The argument is that there is no statutory sanction for claiming interest on the said payment of the differential amount. 3. A counter-affidavit has been filed stating that the petitioner having asked for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... st. It is now made clear that there was no such order and consequently it cannot be argued that at the time of granting permission to pay the amount in instalments it was made clear that the instalments will carry interest. Learned counsel for the respondents only says that in the normal course when a party is permitted to pay the amount in instalments or after a delay of certain time, it goes wit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
