Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1991 (8) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1985, [Raghavendra Enterprises by Managing Partner, B. Singh, Madras-1 v. Union of India by its Secretary (Excise) Ministry of Finance, North Block New Delhi & Others] disposed of alongwith other Writ Petitions. The petitioner in the Writ Petition is the appellant in this Writ Appeal. The respondents in the writ petition are the respondents in this Writ Appeal. Convenience suggests that we refer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... refund. Rulings rendered by Benches of this Court were taken note of by the learned single Judge on this question. The learned single Judge opined that the question as to whether the petitioner has passed on the excise duty to its consumers is a controversial one, which cannot be adjudicated upon by him in writ powers and in this view, the learned single Judge directed the third respondent to exam .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pearing for the petitioner, submits that the view that if the excise duty had been passed on to its consumers, the petitioner would become ineligible to claim the refund is not tenable in the light of pronouncements other than those relied on by the learned single Judge, and in view of the opinion expressed by the learned single Judge on the legal question, the process of going before the third re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the petitioner and now the matter is before the second Appellate Authority, namely, Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Madras. Mr. N. Venkataraman, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the question cannot be treated as stare decisis and one of us (Nainar Sundaram, J.) taking note of the conflicting views expressed in the pronouncements, has made a reference of this .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... who is now seized of the matter. We find that the reference is yet to be made and answered. Accordingly, we deem it fit to vacate and we do vacate the opinion expressed by the learned single Judge that if the petitioner has passed on the excise duty to its consumers, it would become ineligible to claim the refund, The second Appellate Authority, namely, Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates