9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (9) TMI 136X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rarified mandamus, to call for the records of the case and quash S/Order No. 193/96, dated 3-7-1996 passed by the first respondent herein and further direct the first respondent to re-hear the stay applications filed by the respondent herein on merits and pass such further or other orders as may be deemed fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3.A Director of the petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in the matter. The said Mr. Ashok Gupta was indisposed on account of severe lower back pain on 28-6-1996. Therefore, by application dated 28-6-1996, the petitioner sought an adjournment of the proceedings from the first respondent and the first respondent was pleased to grant an adjournment and post the matter for hearing on 3-7-1996. However, Mr. Ashok Gupta did not recover from his ailment by th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ner has not provided any evidence that LABSA is the same as Sulphonic Acid. The first respondent has directed the petitioner to make a pre-deposit of the entire duty demanded by the department, viz., a sum of Rs. 1,55,77,740/- forthwith." 4. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed the above writ petition with the reliefs as prayed for. It is contended by Mr. Arvind P. Datar, learned coun ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... atter before the Tribunal itself is an indication of undue hardship to the petitioner even though the petitioner-company is a reputed company. On the other hand, the learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel, Mr. A. Jayachandran submits that there is no infirmity in the impugned order. 5.I have considered the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
