9911796707
TMI Blog1997 (1) TMI 80X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that it shall be governed by the law declared in Mafatlal Industries v. Union of India - 1997 (89) E.L.T. 247 (S.C.) = 1996 (9) SCALE 457, read with Clause (6) of the format order, a copy of which is enclosed herewith, which is as follows : "Where a refund application or an appeal is preferred under and in accordance with the directions (1), (2), (3) and (4) above, the same shall be entertained only if the applicant for refund/appellant files affidavit stating that he has not passed on the burden of the duty, which is claimed by way of refund, to another person. In case the applicant for refund is a company or a society, the affidavit shall be sworn by the Managing Director or the Principal Officer of the Company or the Society, as the c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y of a writ petition or a suit or any appeal arising therefrom the manufacturer/purchaser shall be entitled to withdraw the writ petition, suit or an appeal arising therefrom, as the case may be, and file an appeal before the appropriate appellate authority within sixty days from today. It is clarified herewith that even in a case where such writ petition has been allowed and an appeal filed by the Revenue is pending, the writ petitioner shall be entitled to withdraw the writ petition, in which event, the Revenue appeal shall be disposed of permitting the writ petitioner to withdraw the writ petition to pursue the remedy proposed hereby. If such an appeal is filed, it shall be entertained without raising an objection on the ground of limita ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of course, remains even in such a case. (5) Where a person challenges the constitutionality of a provision in the Central Excise Act/Customs Act in a High Court or the Supreme Court but fails in his challenge to constitutionality, he cannot take advantage of the decision in the case of another person striking down the said provision, as explained in the judgment. This rule is evolved in the particular context of refund claims under these two enactments and has to be observed. (6) Where a refund application or an appeal is preferred under and in accordance with the directions (1), (2), (3) and (4) above, the same shall be entertained only if the applicant for refund/appellant files affidavit stating that he has not passed on the burden ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
