Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1997 (7) TMI 117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... exemption Notification as well as the effect of the amendment The appellant is entitled to the refund under the relevant Exemption Notification. However, it is for the concerned authority to further look into the refund applications and pass orders in the light of the ratio laid down by this Court in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. Union of India (1996 (12) TMI 50 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA). The appeals are accordingly allowed. - S.C. Sen, K. Venkataswami and V.N. Khare, JJ. Ramesh Singh, Ms. Bina Gupta, Mrs. Rakhi Ray and Mrs. T. Sudha, Advocates, for the appellant. K.N. Bhat, Additional Solicitor-General, K.K. Patil and V.K. Verma, Advocates with him, for the respondents. [Judgment per : K. Venkataswami, J.]. - The appellant as well as the q .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... refund applications the appellant preferred separate appeals one set before Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay, and another set before Collector of Customs (Appeals), Calcutta. The appellate authority at Bombay accepted the claim of the appellant and granted the relief holding the goods imported were in the nature of `Animal Feed Additives' and as such fall under the heading 23.01.07. However, the appellate authority at Calcutta rejected the claim of the appellant and dismissed the appeal accepting the view of Assistant Collector (Refunds). 5.Against the order of the appellate authority at Calcutta the appellant preferred an appeal before the Tribunal and the Revenue preferred appeals before the Tribunal against the orders of the appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... llows :- 23.01/07 Residues and waste of food industries (for example, inedible meat or fish flour or meal), milling residues, waste from sugar, brewing and distilling and starch industries; oil-cake and other residues from oil-extraction (except dregs) products of vegetable origin of a kind used for animal food, not elsewhere specified or included; sweetened forage and other prepared animal fodder. 60% 29.01/45 Organic compounds including antibiotics, Hormones sulpha drugs, Vitamins and other products specified in Notes 1 and 2 to this Chapter. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . 17. Vitamins 100% 94% 10.The relevant Exemption Notification 234/82, dated 1-11-1982 read as follows : Exemption to certain specified goods. - In exe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - `Explanation II - For the purpose of this notification, the expression - (i) "animal feed supplements" means an ingredient or combination of ingredients, added to the basic feed mix or parts thereof to fulfil a specific need, usually used in the micro quantities and requiring careful handling and mixing; (ii) "animal feed concentrates" means a feed intended to be diluted with other feed ingredients to produce complete feed optimum nutrient balance. [Notification No. 6/84-C.E., dated 15-2-1984]" 12.Before proceeding further, it is necessary to state that there is no dispute that the goods imported were pre-mix of vitamin AD-3 (feed grade) not for medicinal use. Again there is no dispute that the said pre-mix of vitamin AD-3 (feed grade) is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... plements. This exemption notification has been amended by another Notification No. 6 of 1984, dated 15th February 1984 as a result of which the item "animal feed including compound livestock feed" is now substituted by "animal feed including compound livestock feed, animal feed supplements and animal feed concentrates." After the coming into force of this notification, the petitioners have been given the benefit of full exemption. The only question is whether prior to this notification, the petitioners are entitled to exemption under the original Notification No. 55 of 1975. In the case of the petitioners themselves namely Glaxo Laboratories India Ltd. v. The State of Gujarat reported in 1979 43 Sales Tax Cases, page 386, the Gujarat High C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oducts which supplement animal feed and are generally added to animal feed are also covered by the generic term "animal feed"." We are in agreement with the above view expressed by the Bombay High Court. No doubt it was contended on behalf of the Revenue that the contrary view taken by the Tribunal has been challenged in this Court which was rejected in limine at the admission stage. We do not think that dismissal at the admission stage can be relied upon as a binding precedent. Even assuming that there are two views possible, it is well settled, that one favourable to the assessee in matters of taxation has to be preferred. 14.We have carefully gone through the minority and the majority views of the Tribunal. We find that Shri K. Gopal Heg .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates