TMI Blog1998 (1) TMI 84X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , Ratlam v. The Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise Bhopal] and W.P. No. 21 of 1998 [M/s. Mardia Steel Ltd., Ratlam v. The Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Bhopal] as they involve identical facts and law. 2.It is not in dispute that petitioner's appeal filed under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act is pending disposal on merits before respondent No. 1. It is further not in dispute that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and the connected petitions with the under noted directions : (1) That respondent No. 1 shall make an endeavour to hear and dispose of petitioner's appeal and stay application within a period of two months hereof in accordance with law. (2) During this period of two months the respondents shall not take any steps to auction petitioner's goods which have already been detained. 6.With these obse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|