9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (2) TMI 133X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of date 27-1-1998 (Annexure P-1 to the writ petition) be quashed. This is an order by which under Rule 230 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for the purposes of exacting an amount of Rs. 9,59,362/-, goods to the value of Rs. 32,35,200/- have been detained. 2. There are two aspects of the matter, which are relevant. An order was passed on 28-10-1997. The petitioner refers to this Order (an order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /- 3,35,667/- 28,101.60 9,59,362/- Against the order of 29-4-1997, the petitioner accepts that an appeal has been filed before the Commissioner, Central Excise, Ghaziabad. The petitioner contends that this appeal was heard on 5-1-1998 and orders of the appellate authority are awaited. 4. All things considered clearly this writ petition has been filed to obtain a stay which exacts the amo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioner or the respondents Suffice to stay that with an alternative remedy provided the application of the petitioner, if moved, will be considered by the appellate authority in either of the two situations, in the appeal where orders are reserved or the appeal which has yet to be filed. 6. The present writ petition is not maintainable with alternative remedies available and is accordingly di ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
