2000 (1) TMI 55

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on strictly question of law. 2.In contest Sarvashri G.M. Chaphekar, sr. counsel instructed by SS Samvatsar, Masani, SM Kolhi with Sanjay Kolhi, AM Mathor, sr. counsel instructed by B. Pandya, AP Patankar, Ashutosh Upadhyay, have been heard for petitioners. Shri BG Neema, standing counsel for Union of India and other respondents have been heard in context with the record of writ petitions. 3.All .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lhi High Court in the matter of Chakara Chemicals & Soaps Inds. v. UOI reported in 1999 (84) ECR 300 (Delhi). The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Bhopal has rejected the applications preferred by all the petitioners for stay/waiver in view of provisions of S.35F of the Act. The Commissioner placed reliance on the judgment of Supreme Court in the matter of Union of India v. Jesus Sales Co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mind. In the present matter unfortunately it does not appear to be so. Therefore, the orders which are being assailed by these petitions can not be upheld as judicial verdicts resulting in rejecting the prayer made by the petitioners for stay/waiver in view of provisions of S. 35F of the Act. 7.In the interest of justice and for maintaining a clean stream of justice all these orders will have to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X