2001 (1) TMI 100

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e and Gold Appellate Tribunal (in short CEGAT) in Appeal No. E/1413/94-D dated 9th August, 1999. Following are the questions in respect of which petitioner seeks reference. "1. Whether in face of material evidence on record to establish that the burden of duty of Central Excise had not been passed on by the Applicant Company to its customers, the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) has erred .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... terial contrary to records and the evidence produced by the applicant company, whether the Collector and the Tribunal have erred in summarily rejecting the claim of refund of the Applicant Company on surmises and assumptions?" 2.Collector of Central Excise held that claim for refund of duty of Rs. 9,24,526/- filed by the petitioner is admissible on merits as well as on the ground of payment of d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... documents highlighted by the learned Counsel. In our view, these documents do not bear out the contention that the burden of duty had not been passed on to the assessees' customers. There is nothing in the invoices which would indicate this. The Chartered Accountant's certificate also is not conclusive of the contention as it only certifies that a particular sum of approximately Rs. 6.71 lakhs ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X