2002 (6) TMI 56

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pplied by the petitioner to the respondent No. 2, Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise raised a demand of Rs. 12,15,081/- on account of differential duty @ 15%, which according to him was leviable on these goods and @ 13% which the petitioner had paid, with Rs. 25,000/- as penalty imposed on non-deposit of due duty. The petitioner says as per communication received from the respondent No. 2, t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the amount of Rs. 3 lakhs the appeal has been dismissed by the C.E.G.A.T. The petitioner has now challenged the same order of the department before this court. The petitioner intentionally and deliberately chose not to get his appeal decided on merit. The Tribunal had shown indulgence and had allowed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3 lakhs out of the demand of Rs. 12,15,081/-. The petitioner has not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X