9911796707
TMI Blog1994 (3) TMI 118X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sion in the case of Vijaya Commercial Credit Ltd. v. VI Income Tax Officer (I.L.R. 1987 (3) Karnataka 2317). In that case, a limited company was accused of the commission of an offence under Section 278B of the Income-Tax Act. It was held, relying on a decision in the case of Kusum v. Sinha (1980 126 ITR 804) that when the Parliament has prescribed a punishment of compulsory imprisonment for an offence, a company or a juristic person cannot possibly by sent to prison. 3.Section 9(1)(i) of the Act reads thus : "9.Offences and Penalties - (1) whoever commits any of the following offences, namely : (a) contravenes any of the provisions of a notification issued under Section 6 or of Section 8, or of a rule made under clause (iii) of sub-s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f this Court dated 11-11-1991 passed in Criminal Petition No. 1295/1989, wherein it is held that the Magistrate was not justified in proceeding against an accused when the offence alleged against a company is punishable with compulsory imprisonment. I am, therefore, of the view that the Magistrate could not have issued process as against A-1, the first petitioner herein. 5.It is also contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that there are no specific allegations against petitioners-2 and 3 (A-2 and A-3) connecting them with the offence alleged. Section 9AA(1) of the Act makes certain persons vicariously liable for the offences committed by the companies. The said provision reads thus: "9-AA.Offences by Companies - (1) Where a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tioners 2 and 3 were not in charge of the affairs of the company or if they were not responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the time of the commission of the offence, they would not be guilty of an offence or offences stated in the complaint. 8.In the case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Ram Kishan Rohtagi (AIR 1983 S.C. 67), it has been held that when the allegations set out in the complaint do not constitute any offence, the High Court is competent to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr. P.C. to quash the order passed by the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence. Similar view was taken by this Court in the case of Shrenikraj v. Labour Officer (I.L.R. 1986 Karnataka 2623). In that cas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
