2006 (10) TMI 156

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 12,29,515/- each had decided to remand the matter to the Commissioner of Central Excise (for the second time) consequent upon the Appellant having filed some documents, before the CEGAT. These documents had not been filed before the Commissioner, and, therefore, the validity of the remand by the CEGAT on this ground would certainly be arguable. Initially this Court had directed notice to issue in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner be granted seven days within which to deposit the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs which was a condition for re-hearing of the matter by the Commissioner. 2. Mr. Y.P. Narula, learned Senior counsel appearing for the Respondent vehemently submits that the Petitioner had succeeded in stalling recovery proceedings for over five years and, therefore, the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs should be further increased. We find .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X