Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (3) TMI 281

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes-the first respondent on 22-12-2006. This writ petition was entertained basically on the ground that the petitioner had claimed that the order in the revision was passed without hearing him. Counter-affidavit has been filed, in which it has been stated that the petitioner was given ample chance to be heard. Since there is an affidavit and counter-affidavi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... obody's case that 'catgut sutures' are used for any other purposes than surgical purposes. It is well known that these sutures are used for the purpose of closing the wounds. In the Encyclopedia Britannica, it is mentioned that 'catgut sutures' are made from sheep intestines and are absorbable in the body of human beings and therefore, they are used for closing the wounds. Henc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes and according to the revisional authority, the items which are mentioned in Entry 208 of the First Schedule to the Act are the only items which can be taxed under this Entry. That is not correct view. A bare perusal of Entry 208 of the First Schedule to the Act shows that all surgical goods would fall under it and the goods mentioned in this Entry are those .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... entioned. For example surgical knives and like goods, which are used in surgeries, are not mentioned in Entry 208. But nobody can say that various types of surgical knives used in surgeries are not included in Entry 208. We are fortified in our view by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Johnson Johnson Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise. 6. Since it will serve no purpose to ask the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates