2006 (11) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... spondent culminating in the final order No. 377/2006., and Miscellaneous Order No. 221/2006 dated 1-5-2006 and quash the same, direct the first respondent to hear the Appeal filed by the petitioner herein on merits. 2. The first respondent-Tribunal by its order dated 1-5-2006 dismissed the application filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay of 22 days in filing the appeal on the premise .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the dates, particularly, the year, that too, at the beginning of the year as he was used to sign quoting the earlier year. When the counsel for the petitioner requested that the year in the dates mentioned in the affidavit as 2006 is only a typographical error, in the absence of any other material to eschew such request, the pedantic attitude of the Tribunal cannot be sustainable legally. This C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X