2006 (11) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndamus to call for the file C/COD/106/2005 and C/163/2005 of the first respondent culminating in the final order No. 377/2006., and Miscellaneous Order No. 221/2006 dated 1-5-2006 and quash the same, direct the first respondent to hear the Appeal filed by the petitioner herein on merits. 2. The first respondent-Tribunal by its order dated 1-5-2006 dismissed the application filed by the petitioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sible person, who sworn the affidavit, can make a mistake in mentioning the dates, particularly, the year, that too, at the beginning of the year as he was used to sign quoting the earlier year. When the counsel for the petitioner requested that the year in the dates mentioned in the affidavit as 2006 is only a typographical error, in the absence of any other material to eschew such request, the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X