2007 (8) TMI 363

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd did some service by fabricating certain units for BHEL and on that ground certain liability for duty came to be imposed on them. It was stated that the work done by them was not a mere job work but they had supplied additional materials. The main matter is pending before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), South Zonal Bench, Chennai-6 in E/1146/2003. 2. Pending app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ad of complying with the said deposit, the petitioner has come forward with filing of the present petition. 3. At the time of writ petition this Court has passed an order to deposit a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs without prejudice to their contention. However aggrieved by that interim order, the TANSI had filed a Writ Appeal being W.A. No. 263 of 2005 wherein the Division Bench was of the opinion that maki .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not depositing the pre-deposit amount, the hearing of their appeal has been delayed for the past three years. 8. The petitioner TANSI being a State owned company the amount directed to be deposited is negligible is considered to the investment of the petitioner-company. 9. Under these circumstances the Writ Petition is misconceived and will stand dismissed. However considering the fact that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X