9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (8) TMI 363X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for BHEL and on that ground certain liability for duty came to be imposed on them. It was stated that the work done by them was not a mere job work but they had supplied additional materials. The main matter is pending before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), South Zonal Bench, Chennai-6 in E/1146/2003. 2. Pending appeal, the petitioner-company took out an applicat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ioner has come forward with filing of the present petition. 3. At the time of writ petition this Court has passed an order to deposit a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs without prejudice to their contention. However aggrieved by that interim order, the TANSI had filed a Writ Appeal being W.A. No. 263 of 2005 wherein the Division Bench was of the opinion that making them to deposit of the amount will make their ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng of their appeal has been delayed for the past three years. 8. The petitioner TANSI being a State owned company the amount directed to be deposited is negligible is considered to the investment of the petitioner-company. 9. Under these circumstances the Writ Petition is misconceived and will stand dismissed. However considering the fact that the matter has been pending for several years, the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
