1991 (3) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e impugned order had allowed respondents claim of drawback under Section 74 of Customs Act, 1962 in respect of corrugated board cartons of specification T-6B which were earlier imported under DEEC scheme and on which duty was paid subsequently as the export obligation could not be fulfilled. 2. A show cause notice having even number dated 5-9-1990 was issued to the respondents calling upon them .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... m the Department had accepted the fact that the claim for drawback was under Section 74. The Asstt. Collector rejected the drawback claim only on the ground that the identity of the goods imported could not be established vis-a-vis the identity of the exported goods. The Collector (Appeals) allowed the appeal of the respondent accepting the fact that they were entitled to claim drawback in terms o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at essential criterion of revisionary jurisdiction is that it corrects and revises the proceedings in a cause already instituted and does not create that cause (particularly in suo moto proceedings like the instant one) the following order is passed. 5. Neither Asstt. Collector nor Collector (Appeals) seem to have satisfied whether other ingredients of Section 74 of Customs Act, 1962 other than .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X