9911796707
TMI Blog1992 (2) TMI 110X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... peal No. CD (DEL) A. 47/84. The respondent Shri R.S. Sidhu was intimated of the Appeal vide Cegat's letter dated 28-1-1984 alongwith one set of Appeal/Application for registration as per rules. In spite of reminders dated 1-5-1985, 11-2-1987, and 30-6-1987 the respondent Shri Raman Singh Sidhu has failed to submit his submissions in the case. Personal hearing fixed on 16-1-1991 was also not atte ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is perverse. In one stroke he would like us to believe that all items other than those mentioned in Rule 3 of the baggage rules be treated as personal and household effects. This argument is simply not acceptable because apart from others it will make Rule 4 partially inapplicable whereby distinction between a professional and non-professional will disappear. Even if the latter were to bring a e.c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the households. With technological development the consumer market is ever expanding to bring in its fold items of latest technology as a aid to household affairs and it is not that the Government is impervious to such market trends. Baggage rules regularly undergo a change including certain items and excluding others. (a computer with limited memory is treated more liberally now). 4. But there ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... household equipment. It has not, but if one were to go by the logic of Collector (Appeals), which essentially means that all items other than those mentioned under Rule 3 be treated as personal and household effects then any thing and everything would be personal effect. Government does not accept this reasoning and hold that even till much later than the time when the respondent arrived, a perso ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
