2000 (9) TMI 115

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned order-in-appeal dated 28-3-2000 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he had reversed the order-in-original of the Addl. Commissioner confirming the duty demand of Rs. 5,74,998/- and Rs. 14,82,763/- on the respondents. 2. The facts are not in dispute. The respondents are engaged in the processing of fabrics given to them by the principal manufacturers on job work basis. They undert .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o of the law laid-down by the Tribunal in the case of M. Tex Anr. v. CCE, Jaipur - 2000 (39) RLT 1091 (CEGAT). 3. We have heard Shri S.N. Singh, SDR for the appellants/Revenue and Shri R. Swaminathan, Consultant for the respondents. 4. It has been fairly conceded by the ld. SDR that the case of the respondents is fully covered by the ratio of the law laid-down by the Tribunal in the case of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X