9911796707
TMI Blog2003 (3) TMI 190X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... affirmed the order-in-original of the Deputy Commissioner disallowing the Modvat credit of Rs. 2,08,500/- and imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/-, on the appellants. 2. The facts are not much in dispute. The appellants availed the Modvat credit of the above said amount on 30-6-99 in respect of the capital goods under Rule 57Q without any supporting duty paying documents. This credit had been disall ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... credit of the Modvat credit could be taken suo motu by the appellants when earlier they had already debited the same. The Counsel has only referred to the case of Indo-American Electricals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur - 1999 (108) E.L.T. 797 wherein it has been observed that re-crediting of the amount could not be denied on the ground of non-seeking of the permission of the Assis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... here is no provision in the Modvat Rules requiring permission for retaking of the credit, is wholly mis conceived and cannot be accepted. Under the rules, for taking re-credit, prior permission of the jurisdictional A.C. is required. 5. In the light of the discussions made above, in my view, re-credit of the disputed amount has been rightly denied to the appellants. The impugned order of the Com ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
