2004 (3) TMI 182

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... gainst the demands of Rs. 55,490/- and Rs. 30,733/-. The demand of Rs. 55,490/- was raised on the ground that the appellant received higher value of goods supplied by them on account of price variation clause. The additional consideration was revised on 30-7-1999 and on a visit by the officers of the Department of Revenue on 6-10-1999, it was found that the appellant had not paid differential duty .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rges are manufacturing expenses. The additional consideration received by them on account of these activities is part of assessable value of goods. In these circumstances, we find no infirmity in the impugned order whereby the demand was confirmed on this account. The loading unloading expenses are part of transportation charges, to that extent, the expenses are to be treated as part of freight .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X