9911796707
TMI Blog2004 (3) TMI 260X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the appellants. The said amount was deposited by the party under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act in Appeal No. E/2900/93 as directed by this Tribunal. That appeal was allowed as per Final Order No. A/71/98/NB, dated 19-2-1998 [1991 (109) E.L.T. 604 (T)] as modified by Misc. Order No. M/271/98/NB(DB), dated 9-10-1998 passed in ROM application No. 46/98/NB. As per the said order, the demand ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n in Sharda Synthetics Ltd. v. CCE [2003 (156) E.L.T. 730]. 3. I have heard the DR also, who has not cited any authority on the issue, better than what has been cited by the counsel. 4. The facts of the case are not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that the issue involved in this case stands squarely covered by the decision of this Tribunal in Sharda Synthetics (supra). In that case, it w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s (supra), the present appellants are entitled to interest on the above amount of Rs. 10 lakhs from 12-6-1998 (date after three months from the date of receipt of Final Order of the Tribunal) to 30-12-1999. It is ordered accordingly. The interest shall be paid as early as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. The impugned order sta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
