Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1990 (4) TMI 82

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e said allowance. The assessee company purchased tin plates, processed those plates, cut them, varnished them, sorted them, slit them and subjected them to what is called lacquering process and then sold them to the customers according to their requirements. The machinery used by the assessee is called Slitting-line machine and Varnishing-line machine. According to the learned C.I.T., the machinery was not utilised for any type of manufacturing process in the case of the assessee. There was no evidence of any manufacture or production of articles. What the assessee was engaged in was process of the metal sheets or tin sheets. The end-product is only slightly different as a result of various processes carried out by the assessee. It was argu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed to the order of the learned C.I.T. and argued that the order passed by the learned C.I.T. is without jurisdiction and in excess of his jurisdiction and the order is, therefore, bad in law. It has further been submitted that the assessee company was engaged in manufacture of lacquered strips which were used in packing industry. This manufacture is quite different and is distinctly known in the market than the raw material which was used for manufacture. In support of the argument, the learned authorised representative has filed a Paper Book containing, inter alia, a letter dated 16-12-1985 from Rajendra Co., Chartered Accountants to the CIT, Bombay City IV, Bombay in response to notice u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act. The learned authori .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that the learned CIT has clearly brought out the nature of business of the assessee to establish that it was not engaged in the manufacture or production of an article or thing. The assessee was only processing articles or things and such activity does not amount to manufacture or production of an article or a thing. The learned senior Departmental Representative has further argued that the CIT is perfectly justified in passing order u/s. 263 of the Act and cancelling the assessment order of the ITO. To this proposition, reliance was placed on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Smt. Tara Devi Aggarwal v. CIT [1973] 88 ITR 323 and the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Gee Vee Enterprises v. Addl. CIT [1975] 99 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at length by the learned CIT, it is clear that the assessee was engaged in processing metal sheets or tin sheets and the end-product remains almost the same as the raw material used. Further we find at Sl. No. 10 of the Auditors' Report for the year ended 30th November, 1982 that "the company is a processing company, so it has no by-products and for realisable scrap reasonable records for its sale and disposal has been maintained". It is, therefore, clear that the assessee is a processing company as can be seen from the Auditors' Report reproduced above. As regards the judicial decisions relied upon by the learned counsel, we find that the facts of the present case are different and distinguishable from the facts considered by the Hon'ble H .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... merely wanted to be assessed in his hands in order to assist some one else who would have been assessed to a larger amount. Their Lordships held that an assessment so made will be erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue and the CIT has jurisdiction u/s. 33B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 to cancel the assessment. It has further been held by the Delhi High Court in the case of Gee Vee Enterprises that failure to make inquiries before passing final orders is erroneous and the CIT has the power to set aside such orders passed by the ITO. In view of the facts discussed above and the judicial decisions briefly narrated, we are of the opinion that the order passed by the learned CIT u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is perfectly justified .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates