9911796707
TMI Blog1981 (7) TMI 100X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... II(1), Bombay, passed in the asst. yr. 1976-77. 2. The relevant facts, in brief, are that the assessee is a non-resident shipping company, having operations in India. The assessee had earned total freight on export cargo in respect of 12 voyages amounting to $ 2,98,494, during the previous year ended on 31st Aug., 1976, relevant for the assessment year under consideration. The assessee computed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the assessee, and as such, the value of the dollar is to be taken from the freight earnings at Rs. 7.50 per dollar. The CIT (A) accepted the contention of the assessee, and took the value of dollar at Rs. 7.50 in view of the provisions of r. 115 of the Rules. 4. The revenue, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order of the CIT (A), has preferred this appeal. Smt. Meenakshi Singh, ld. D ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntentions and gone through the record before us. We are of the opinion that the appeal of the Revenue, on the issue, is to fail. The reasons are that the previous year; relevant for the assessment year under consideration, ended on 31st March, 1976, and r. 115 of the Rules has been amended w.e.f. 1st Nov., 1977. Therefore, it is manifest that the rule was there in the previous year; relevant for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rnings. The Deptl. Rep. has admitted the factual position that the Tribunal has taken the value at Rs. 7.50 per dollar in the aforesaid case, and there is no distinguishing feature of the case of the assessee with that of the Tribunal, rather, the appeal is there on the issue to keep them after alive. Hence, we hold that the issue involved in this appeal is covered by the aforesaid decision of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
