Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1984 (10) TMI 80

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... desh. The assessee found that no person was willing to buy the distribution rights in respect of the territory of Andhra Pradesh and so he valued the closing stock of that distribution right at nil. Regarding the territory of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, the assessee had entered into an agreement with a party on 11th March, 1975 to sell the distribution right of that territory at Rs. 1,70,000. However, that party never took delivery of the picture because it turned out to be a flop in other territories. The assessee entered into negotiations with that party who finally agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,35,000 as per the agreement dt. 3rd Aug., 1977. It may be stated that the accounting year of the assessee ended on 30th June, 1977, but its books of ac .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, the valuation adopted by the assessee should have been accepted in the facts and circumstances of the case. The CIT(A) agreed with this contention and directed the ITO to adopt the figure of Rs. 1,35,000 in place of Rs. 3,38,384 taken in the assessment order. 5. Shri Roy Slphonso, the ld. Representative for the Department urged before us that the ld. CIT(A) erred in his decision. He stated that percentages stated in r. 9A should have been strictly applied by the CIT(A) and no reduction should have been given. On the other hand, Shri V. H. Patil, the ld. Representative for the assessee, urged before us that the CIT(A) has done the correct thing. He relied on the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Smt. Kusumben D. Mahadevi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... considered the contentions of both the parties as well as the facts on record. We find force in the contention raised for the assessee. It is indeed true that the Bombay High Court has held in the case of Smt. Kusumben D. Mahadevia that the rules made under the WT and IT Act are directory and not mandatory. Apart from the above, that fact that nobody ever bought the distribution rights relating to the territory of Andhra Pradesh and the fact that the assessee got nothing more than Rs. 1,35,000 in respect of the territories of Tamil Nadu and Kerala have not been controverted before us. It is also true that the method of valuation of closing stock is done at the option of the assessee. If the assessee has chosen to value the closing stock at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates