TMI Blog1988 (5) TMI 64X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted accounts and certificate in Form No. 10B. The ITO made the assessment on the total income of Rs.1,24,909. The ITO was of the opinion that the assessee cannot be allowed exemption under s. 11 of the Act, because it contravened the provisions of s. 13(1)(d)(ii) of the Act. The ITO was of the view that investment had not been made by the assessee as specified in s. 11(5) of the Act. 2. The ass ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the Trust continued to be invested even after 30th Nov., 1983. It is clear that the Statute granted time for conversion of the investment. The last date was 30th Nov., 1983. The previous year of the assessee ended on 31st March, 1983. Therefore, it cannot be said that the assessee had contravened the provisions of s. 11(5) r/w s. 13(1)(d)(ii) of the Act. Consequently, the assessee was eligibl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uently, it was indicated that investment must be converted as required by s. 11(5) on or before 30th Nov., 1983. The assessee's previous year ended on 31st March, 1983. Therefore, unless the last date is expired, it cannot be said that the assessee has contravened the provisions of s. 11(5) r/w s. 13(1)(d)(ii) of the Act. The question of making any contravention during the year under assessment do ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|