1982 (10) TMI 76

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s. 154 proceedings not being free from debate, was nothing more than reopening the concluded assessment and the action of the ITO in that regard, which has been duly confirmed by the AAC when the matter was carried before him, is against law and deserves to be undone. 2. The ld. counsel for the assessee Mr. D.K. Gupta, while arguing the case vehemently, took us through Fifth Schedule and submit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (1979) 119 ITR 142 (All) and submitted that mistake is apparent being a mistake overlooking of law and there is no debate about the same. 4. After taking into consideration the rival submissions, we are unable to sustain the finding of the AAC. The most importance fact, which is not controverted by the ld. departmental representative before us, was that the assessee was manufacturing woollen y .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and arguments for both the sides show that the issue is not free from debate. It was only incorrect perusal of Fifth Schedule which made the ITO to allow particular percentage of development rebate, which he modified subsequently after looking to the fact that the said material produced or manufactured by the assessee, did not find place in the said Schedule but something more when he computed de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X