Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - no satisfaction as required by ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) invalid due to AO's failure to record necessary satisfaction during assessment.

April 30, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - no satisfaction as required by law has been recorded by AO during the assessment proceedings, hence, imposition of penalty is bad in law. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - no satisfaction as required by ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) invalid due to AO's failure to record necessary satisfaction during assessment.

April 30, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There was the need for the AO to record the clear satisfaction with respect to each addition/disallowances made during the assessment proceedings...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment orders issued u/s 153C for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 were beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

AO having failed to record his satisfaction while initiating proceedings for imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) as to which limb of the provisions of section 271(1)(c)...

The assessment order passed u/s 153C was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC instead of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Quick Updates: