Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Companies Law - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2013 Year 2013 This

Abuse of Dominant position - (Apple/Airtel/Vodafone) - ...


Competition Commission of India dismisses allegations of abuse of dominant position in tech and telecom sales arrangement.

May 29, 2013

Case Laws     Companies Law     Commission

Abuse of Dominant position - (Apple/Airtel/Vodafone) - distribution/ sales arrangement between Apple and Airtel/Vodafone - there is no anti-competitive effect of the tie-in arrangement as alleged by the Informant - CCI

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The CCI dismissed allegations of anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Regarding Section 3, the...

  2. The CCI dismissed allegations against Microsoft regarding the bundling of Microsoft Defender with Windows OS. The Commission found no violation of Section 4 of the...

  3. Uber’s discount and incentive policy - Abuse of Dominant Position - so long as this dominant position, whether directly or indirectly, imposes an unfair price in...

  4. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) examined whether Indian Rare Earths Limited (IREL), a public sector undertaking, contravened Section 4 of the Competition Act,...

  5. Anti-Competitive Agreements - Monopoly - abuse of dominant position - principal bone of contention of the appellants is that Coal India Limited, the first appellant...

  6. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) observed that compliance with sectoral regulator's framework remains independent of any practice falling afoul of the...

  7. Anti-competition - Appellant has alleged the anti-competitive conduct of WhatsApp - What the Appellant has failed to prove that the Opposite party/Respondent is abusing...

  8. NCLAT dismissed the appeal concerning alleged abuse of dominant position under Sections 3(4) and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Appellant failed to disclose that...

  9. Anti-competitive agreements - Dominant position of Google in India - In terms of the provisions of Section 27 of the Act, the Commission hereby directs Google to cease...

  10. TDS u/s 195 - sales commission expenses paid to agents outside India - The commission income earned by foreign agents for services rendered outside India does not accrue...

  11. The Commission perused the material and public domain information. The Informant alleged unfair and discriminatory interest rate hikes, frequent increases, and...

  12. Notification amends Competition Commission of India (Procedure for Engagement of Experts and Professionals) Regulations, 2009. Substitutes "experts or professionals...

  13. This notification brings into force the provisions of Section 19(f) of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023, issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Section 19(f)...

  14. The notification is issued u/s 20(3) of the Competition Act, 2002 relating to Inquiry into combination by Commission. It aims to adjust the thresholds for assets and...

  15. The ITAT Mumbai ruled on TDS u/s 195 regarding commission paid to foreign agents for procuring export orders. The assessee paid commission to non-resident agents outside...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates