Proprietor of Trademark – FENA - There can be no concern of ...

Court Rules No Confusion in Trademark Case for "FENA" Outside Class 3; Plaintiff Wins Only Within Class 3.

August 13, 2013

Case Laws Companies Law HC

Proprietor of Trademark – FENA - There can be no concern of confusion with regard to goods and services of the plaintiff outside of Class 3 - Decided in favour of the plaintiff only to the extent of Class 3 goods and services, and against the plaintiff with regards to goods and services outside Class 3. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Proprietor of Trademark – FENA - There can be no concern of ...

Court Rules No Confusion in Trademark Case for "FENA" Outside Class 3; Plaintiff Wins Only Within Class 3.

August 13, 2013

Case Laws Companies Law HC

You may also like:

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

The appellant provided steamer agent and cargo handling agency services, which involved segregation, internal shifting of timber logs, and sending progress reports to...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - AO opined that banker’s cheques were not covered in any of the provisions of Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules as they were the account payee...

The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction for possession of the suit property and a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing or interfering...

Valuation of imported goods - Admittedly, it is evident on the face of the record that deductive value was available before the Court below which have not been rejected...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Classification of goods - Rava Idli Mix - In the instant case the impugned product is admittedly a mixture and does not give the character of either of the constituent...

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

Application of Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - There is no percentage fixed in the Cenvat Credit Rules to decide that if dutiable goods are much below that...

Availment of CENVAT Credit - Non maintenance of separate account - When it is impossible to comply with the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 6, it would not be...

Export of services or not - Services provided outside India - Parent Company / 100% holding company - Distinct Person or not - POPOS Rules - It appears that the...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - There is no requirement under Rule 6(3)(i) and Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules that the option had to be exercised on the first day of...

Appeal rejected on the ground of delay - Refund of unutilised input tax credit - The Court examined the interpretation of Rule 108(3) of the CGST Rules, which mandated...

Quick Updates: