Confiscation of goods under Rules 25 of the CER, 2002 – goods ...

Case Laws Central Excise

August 14, 2013

Confiscation of goods under Rules 25 of the CER, 2002 – goods are not entered in RG-I Register, but it cannot be said that by merely not entering in RG-I Register, there was any intention to evade duty by the appellants - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Confiscation of goods under Rules 25 of the CER, 2002 – goods ...

Case Laws Central Excise

August 14, 2013

You may also like:

Confiscation of goods under Rule 25 of CE Rules 2002 – redemption fine in lieu of confiscation was not imposable when goods were allowed to be cleared - AT

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices without accompanying the goods - appellant not dealt with the excisable goods at all. The penalties on the...

Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding confiscation of raw material/semi-finished goods - Rule 25, under which the semi-finished processed goods has been...

Penalty under rule 26 of the CER, 2002 can be imposed on a person only when it is proved beyond doubt that the person dealing with excisable goods knew or had reason to...

Requirement for claiming remission of duty - clearance of defective finished goods as Waste/scrap goods - once goods entered into RG-1 registered, it is necessary that a...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 25 - CENVAT credit - Even though the goods are not confiscated there is clear contravention of the provisions of the Rules/Notifications as...

Excess material found during search in the premises of Job worker - provisions of Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 are not...

Rule 11 of the central Excise Rules read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules,2002 - TThe reason that the goods were not available to confiscation should not be a...

Default in payment of duty - Rule 8 (3A) of C.E. Rules, 2002 - The major consequence is that such goods would have been liable to seizure and confiscation under Rule 25...

Waiver of Penalty under Rule 25 of the CE Rules - For default of payment of duty under Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - no penalty can be imposed under Rule...

Confiscation of goods – Unaccounted goods - Non-entry of goods in RG-I register – Intention to evade duty - the wire in question is not liable to confiscation for their...

Clandestine removal - issue of mis-classification - goods entered in RG-1 register - full stay granted. - AT

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Quick Updates: