Recall of Order - Creditor’s Winding-up Petition u/s ...

Court Rules Workmen's Input Not Required at First Motion of Winding-Up Petition Under Companies Act 1956.

August 19, 2013

Case Laws Companies Law HC

Recall of Order - Creditor’s Winding-up Petition u/s 433(e)/434(1)(a)/439 of the Companies Act, 1956 – It was not obligatory for the court to hear the workmen at the first motion stage, for which there was no provision in the Act or the Rules and that the concerns of the workmen may be addressed at the meeting of the secured creditors or at the second motion stage - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recall of Order - Creditor’s Winding-up Petition u/s ...

Court Rules Workmen's Input Not Required at First Motion of Winding-Up Petition Under Companies Act 1956.

August 19, 2013

Case Laws Companies Law HC

You may also like:

The case involved the rejection of a claim for statutory interest under Rule 156 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 in favor of the workmen. The court held that under...

Refund - Zero rated supplies - Computation of Turnover - sale of duty credit e-Scrips - Rule 42, Rule 89(4) and Rule 89(4B) of the CGST Act - The relevancy of the...

CENVAT Credit - input - fuel - the exception to sub-rule (1) which is contained in sub-rule (2) itself contains an exception, namely, inputs intended to be used as fuel....

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Supplementary refund of unutilized input tax credit pertaining to Compensatory Cess - Section 164 of the GST Act empowers the Government to frame rules. Refund of...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices - performa invoices - the documents required under the Rule 9 are not confined to merely invoices but these may be any documents,...

Cenvat credit - Once the credit is availed, the use of such credit is governed by Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Sub-Rule (4) of the said Rule stipulates that...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

The Madras High Court considered the issue of personal hearing notice u/s FEMA 1999. The Court held that Rule 4(3) does not require the reasoned opinion to be...

CENVAT Credit - common inputs and input services - it is an undisputed fact that the appellant had reversed the entire amount of Cenvat credit as required under Rule...

The case revolves around determining whether an employee qualifies as a "workman" u/s 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which would entitle them to certain...

The High Court considered the grant of statutory interest u/s 156 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 and the scope of u/s 483 of the Companies Act, 1956. It held that...

Non-payment of service tax on the input services - removal of input as such from the factory - requirement of reversal of CENVAT Credit as per the provisions of sub-rule...

Works Contract or not - supplies of goods or services for 'selling up of network' - composite supply/principal supply - two ruling of the AAR - first one was accepted...

Quick Updates: