Default in Monthly Payment - Penalty under Section 11AC was not ...

Penalty u/s 11AC Not Applicable for Bona Fide Mistake; Rule 25 Penalty of Rs. 50,000 Sufficient.

September 12, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Default in Monthly Payment - Penalty under Section 11AC was not imposable in cases where default had occurred because of bona fide mistaken belief - It was only a deemed removal without payment of duty - Penalty of Rs. 50,000 under Rule 25 would meet the ends of justice in the case - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Default in Monthly Payment - Penalty under Section 11AC was not ...

Penalty u/s 11AC Not Applicable for Bona Fide Mistake; Rule 25 Penalty of Rs. 50,000 Sufficient.

September 12, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Levy of fine / penalty - Failure to file the copies of the Annual Returns with the Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra, Mumbai within prescribed time - bona fide delay...

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-...

Demand Interest u/s 201(1A) - Non deduction TDS u/s 194IA - As per the sale deed the details of the sellers / transferors of the said property and in fact the sellers...

Amendment to rules governing salary, allowances and service conditions of Chairperson and members of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Key changes: Chairperson's...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

CESTAT upheld the demand for differential duty on imported betel nuts from Indonesia, rejecting the appellant's objection regarding time limitation. The Tribunal...

The notification amends the National Financial Reporting Authority (Manner of Appointment and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Chairperson and Members) Rules,...

CESTAT upheld penalty under Section 112(b) of Customs Act against appellant for involvement in cigarette smuggling racket. While appellant retracted initial statement,...

Quick Updates: