Revision u/s 263 - Merely because AO passed a cryptic order or ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 20, 2013

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because AO passed a cryptic order or might have made inadequate enquiry would not be a ground to set aside the assessment order – The order passed by the AO thus cannot be termed as erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because AO passed a cryptic order or ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 20, 2013

You may also like:

Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

Revision u/s 263 - It is evident that A.O. made enquiries on the issue and assessee complied to the enquiries and filed all the required details. Thus, it is not a case...

The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

Revision u/s 263 - inadequate or no inquiry by AO - If there is some inquiry by the Assessing Officer in the original proceedings, even if inadequate, that cannot clothe...

Revision u/s 263 - “no inquiry” v/s “inadequate inquiry” - there is a distinction between merely calling for information on a particular issue and considering such...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - reopening on the basis of letter written by JCIT - In the case in hand the Ld. Revisional Authority has done no homework on its end but merely...

Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - One has to keep in mind the distinction between “lack of inquiry” and inadequate inquiry”. - If there was any inquiry, even inadequate that would not...

Revision u/s 263 - The type, nature and extent of investigation is the prerogative of the Assessing Officer. Pr. CIT, cannot, in our view, invoke his power u/s 263 for...

Revision u/s 263 - As the assessment was completed after making required amount of enquiry and there was no lake of enquiry or investigation by the AO on the issues...

Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT while passing the order u/s 263 cannot remand the matter back to the AO for passing the fresh order as it will lead to the conclusion that...

Quick Updates: