Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2013 Year 2013 This

It was just and proper for the Revenue to demonstrate as to how ...


CESTAT to Decide if Revenue's Admissions Before Settlement Commission Were Binding or Incorrect.

October 4, 2013

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

It was just and proper for the Revenue to demonstrate as to how the admissions made before the Settlement Commission were erroneous and it was just and proper for the CESTAT to record a finding as to why the admissions made by the Revenue before the Settlement Commission were not binding on the Revenue - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Power of AO to pass an assessment order where application was filed before settlement commission – Income Tax Settlement Commission, rejected the application - decided...

  2. The High Court held that the Settlement Commission cannot reopen its concluded proceedings by invoking Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. Section 154 allows...

  3. The ITAT set aside orders passed by CIT(A) and ACIT under s.154, holding that additions to the assessee's income based solely on admissions made in an application to the...

  4. Addition on protective addition - Application to Income tax Settlement Commission[ITSC] - the provisions of Section 245I does not give protection to the whole world with...

  5. Validity of reopening of assessment - An order u/s 245D(4) already been passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) - Scope of harmonious construction - The...

  6. Validity of order passed by Settlement Commission - Unless the twin conditions mentioned therein are fulfilled, the Settlement Commission cannot move further in the...

  7. Validity of Settlement Commission order - by virtue of Section 132 (4A), Section 56 (2) (vii) and Section 292 (C), the presumption in law arose as a consequence of the...

  8. Challenge against the order passed by the Settlement Commission - reason behind the creation of Settlement Commission is to give a quietus to the dispute between the two...

  9. The Settlement Commission's order accepting the additional income offered as cash gifts from relatives was reasonable and fair. The immunity from penalty and prosecution...

  10. Validity of Settlement commission order - The settlement was mutually beneficial and acceptable. The money stood accepted without any protest or demur. As such, at a...

  11. Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act,...

  12. The High Court held that while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, it does not assume the role of an appellate authority to conduct a merit...

  13. Settlement in a cheque dishonor case u/s 138 NI Act recorded by the court after satisfying its voluntariness is legally binding. Upon breach, the court must initiate...

  14. Settlement of case - before submitting reply to the show cause notice, approached the Settlement Commission - The dismissal of the application filed before the...

  15. Application filed before the Settlement Commission - Settlement Commission passed the impugned order though there was no true and full disclosure by the assessee in the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates