Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty levied @ 300% - From the ...

300% Tax Penalty Not Applicable Post-June 1, 2007, u/s 271AAA for Section 132 Actions.

October 17, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty levied @ 300% - From the provisions of Section 271AAA it is clear that in the case where action U/s 132 is initiated on or after 01/06/2007, penalty cannot be levied U/s 271(1)c) of the Act. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty levied @ 300% - From the ...

300% Tax Penalty Not Applicable Post-June 1, 2007, u/s 271AAA for Section 132 Actions.

October 17, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of services provided by the appellant as Works Contract Service or Construction of Residential...

The CESTAT held: The demand of service tax under 'site formation service' for June 2005 to May 2007 by culling out site formation charges from a composite mining...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Works Contract - Levy of service tax prior to 1.6.2007 - Whether service tax can be levied on indivisible works contracts prior to the introduction, on 1st June, 2007,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since the search took place on 04.09.2008 i.e. after first day of June 2007, therefore, penalty if any was leviable that was to be levied u/s...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee company had been assessed to tax under the deeming provisions of Sec. 115JB of the Act, therefore, on the basis of our...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - maximum penalty @ 300% - Defective notice - non specification of any specific limb or clause - AO has conclusively held in the penalty order that...

Constitutional Validity of amendment to the Industrial Policy Resolution 2007 (IPR 2007) - Opposite Parties do not deny that Petitioner No.1 fulfils the triple test...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the amended provision of Explanation 5A made applicable w.r.e.f from 1.6.2007 cannot be pressed into service.

Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service or Business Auxiliary Service classification discussed. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as certain agreements...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - this is not a fit case for levy of 300% penalty. Therefore, we direct the assessing officer to levy minimum penalty i.e. 100% of the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

Quick Updates: