Recovery of tax dues and penalties from successor - Scope of ...

Assessing Officer to Decide on Successor's Tax Penalty Liability u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.

December 13, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Recovery of tax dues and penalties from successor - Scope of section 270(1) - AO will decide whether penalty amount under Section 271(1)(c) can be recovered from the petitioner, even when the liability was determined subsequent to the date of succession - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recovery of tax dues and penalties from successor - Scope of ...

Assessing Officer to Decide on Successor's Tax Penalty Liability u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.

December 13, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

The Appellate Tribunal adjudicated on the issue of addition of interest income and penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The assessee contended that the interest income from a Fixed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income has not been made out against the assessee. - Though, similar disallowances were made by...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Suo-moto declaration of undisclosed assets located outside India under section 59 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - in the present case the result of assessing the income either under the head ‘income from other sources’ or u/s.68 of the Act, the liability to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Quick Updates: