We really fail to understand that if the appellant started ...

Case Laws Service Tax

December 13, 2013

We really fail to understand that if the appellant started paying a tax under the category of mining services w.e.f. 1.6.2007, how the said action of the assessee would reflect upon their malafide or any suppression or mis-statement of facts with an intent to evade payment of tax, during the relevant period under the category of ‘Technical Testing and Analysis’ - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

We really fail to understand that if the appellant started ...

Case Laws Service Tax

December 13, 2013

You may also like:

The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of services provided by the appellant as Works Contract Service or Construction of Residential...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Mining services / activities - composite contract - prima facie liable to service tax only from 1-6-2007 - AT

Extended period of limitation - if the appellant started paying a tax under the category of mining services w.e.f. 1.6.2007, how the said action of the assessee would...

Adjustment excess tax paid under Rule 6(3) - first service tax was paid but later adjusted on the ground that other party is liable to pay service tax - stay granted - AT

Adjustment of excess paid service tax – rule 6(3) of STR, 1994

Suo motu adjustment of excess service tax paid – Rule 6(4A) - stay granted.

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Works Contract - Levy of service tax prior to 1.6.2007 - Whether service tax can be levied on indivisible works contracts prior to the introduction, on 1st June, 2007,...

Commercial and Industrial Construction Services - The appellants are liable to pay service tax under Works' Contract services with effect from 1.6.2007 - Demand...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

Disllowance of CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(5) of CCR provides that the provisions of Rule 6(1), (2) and (3) are not applicable, where input service received is used both for...

Cargo handling service or manpower supply service was the central issue. The demand raised for service tax on 'cargo handling service' was held unsustainable as the...

CENVAT Credit - input services - Irrespective of the person whether it is service recipient or service provider is liable to pay the service tax but so long the service...

Construction services - after 1.6.2007, demand in respect of composite contracts would fall under works contract service only - the demand of service tax under...

Quick Updates: