Reopening of Assessment – The provisions contained in Section ...

High Court Rules in Favor of Assessee Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions of Section 151 in Assessment Reopening.

February 20, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Reopening of Assessment – The provisions contained in Section 151 are indubitably mandatory in nature and since compliance was either not made or could be established by the revenue, benefit will have to be given to the assessee - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of Assessment – The provisions contained in Section ...

High Court Rules in Favor of Assessee Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions of Section 151 in Assessment Reopening.

February 20, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The ITAT held that the final assessment order under s.143(3) was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to issue a mandatory draft assessment order under s.144C(1) for...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the assessment order for the assessee and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment after...

Assessee's appeal allowed by ITAT against penalty u/s 271B for non-compliance with Section 44AB. Assessee demonstrated reasonable cause for failure to file return and...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

ITAT quashed assessment order due to jurisdictional defect in notice issuance under Section 143(2). While ACIT had pecuniary jurisdiction to conduct assessment of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged due to lack of material relating to alleged wrongful IGST refunds for assessment year 2020-21. Disallowable expenditure...

Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed....

Refund of amount of mandatory pre-deposit - adjustment/set off the amount of refund against the arrears towards assessee - There exist no other provision in the Act...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for "non-genuine loss" on account of assessee's transactions in futures and options (F&O) was unjustified. The reasons recorded did not...

Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

AO proceeded with best judgment assessment u/s 144 making addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash deposit. CIT(A) upheld penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with...

Non-service of mandatory notice u/s 143(2) renders assessment proceedings void ab initio. Revenue failed to prove sending of notice by ordinary post/registered post or...

Scrutiny assessment - issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Non compliance of assessee v/s Non compliance of AO - Can assessee take advantage of his own non compliance -...

Quick Updates: