Merely, because the appellant had initially made a claim for ...

Court Rules No Misdeclaration in Appellant's Duty Exemption Claim Based on Documents Provided.

March 10, 2014

Case Laws Customs AT

Merely, because the appellant had initially made a claim for exemption from duty based on the documents available, it cannot be said that the appellant had misdeclared the goods - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Merely, because the appellant had initially made a claim for ...

Court Rules No Misdeclaration in Appellant's Duty Exemption Claim Based on Documents Provided.

March 10, 2014

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices (document) - cenvat credit availed on the strength of railway receit - Rule 9 is subservient to Rule 3 for determining the...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices - performa invoices - the documents required under the Rule 9 are not confined to merely invoices but these may be any documents,...

Disallowance of prior period expenses pertaining to expenditure crystallized or details received after completion of earlier years' audits. Genuineness not doubted,...

The High Court addressed the issue of exemption u/s 10(25)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer denied the exemption to the assessee fund, claiming it lost...

Benefit of exemption subject to the condition that no Cenvat Credit is availed - The appellant are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. when they...

Disallowance of exemption claim - sale of Maize - TNVAT - The exemption was a product based exemption and not user based exemption or an assessee based exemption - AO...

The Calcutta High Court considered the maintainability of a petition challenging the penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The...

E-way bill Rules - Rule 138B as amended - Verification of documents and conveyances.

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - Onus to prove - The High court noted that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including bank statements, cash-flow...

Petitioner failed to submit original shipping bills to substantiate claimed exports, providing only photocopies which were not accepted for meeting export obligation....

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Registration of the Trust u/s 12AA denied - Rule 17(A)(a) show that when the trust is not created under an instrument it is impossible to produce any constitutive...

The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust...

Quick Updates: