CENVAT Credit - invoices are in the name of their head office - ...

Penalty of Rs. 10,000 Upheld Due to Lack of Separate Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case Involving Head Office Invoices.

March 29, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

CENVAT Credit - invoices are in the name of their head office - even imposition of penalty of Rs.10,000/- is not called for, but in as much as the respondents have not challenged the said order, by way of filing a separate appeal, the same cannot be set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

CENVAT Credit - invoices are in the name of their head office - ...

Penalty of Rs. 10,000 Upheld Due to Lack of Separate Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case Involving Head Office Invoices.

March 29, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

The High Court considered a case involving smuggling of gold under Sections 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b) of The Customs Act, 1962. The petitioners were found in possession of...

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding 17 previous Bills of Entry, finding that the test report from a later import (Bill of Entry No. 4199210) could not...

HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

ITAT upheld partial rejection of books under s.145(3) due to unverifiable self-made cash vouchers, though specific quantification was lacking. Given turnover of...

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

SC modified honorarium structure for High-Powered Sale Committee (HPSC) members due to infrequent meetings creating compensation disparity. Initially, Member Secretary...

Quick Updates: