Application of sections 21 and 22 of the SEZ Act - Non obstante ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 3, 2014

Application of sections 21 and 22 of the SEZ Act - Non obstante clause - Demand raised by the respondents from the present petitioners for payment of purchase tax under section 9(5) of the VAT Act is invalid and impermissible - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Application of sections 21 and 22 of the SEZ Act - Non obstante ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 3, 2014

You may also like:

This case pertains to the precedence and priority of consideration between an application filed u/s 54(C) and Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)...

Validity of conviction made - conviction based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act - evidentiary value present or...

The Advance Ruling Authority rejected the application made by the applicant for pronouncement of ruling as the questions raised were not covered under any of the clauses...

Reversal of Input tax credit - inputs consumed in expired Cakes & Pastries - The Non-obstante clause of Section 17(5)( h) of CGST Act, 2017 overrides the operation of...

Dishonor of Cheque - settlement of disputes between the parties - compounding of offences u/s 138 - Needless to say, the operation or effect of a general Act can be...

Disallowance u/s.40(b) - remuneration paid to partners - requirement of discloser in Clause 21(c) of Form 3CD - Although the details referred to in Clause 21(c) does...

CHA - once proceedings under Regulation 22 is initiated which is normally done after the completion of investigations in a case, the proceedings under Regulation 21 go...

Admission of Section 9 application filed by Operational Creditor - time limitation - Section 10A of IBC - The Tribunal found that apart from the lease rental of April...

Validity of order of NCLT admitting the application for CIRP - Although, pendency of winding-up petition before the High Court may not preclude filing of Section 7...

Adjustment of amount of tax paid on inter-state sale transaction, against the tax to be paid to the State of Jharkhand - In the present case the transaction is for the...

Admissibility of application for Advance ruling u/s 245R - Pending case - The pendency has to be considered on the date of filing of the application and there was no...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT issued the above show cause notice u/s 263 in respect of specified domestic transactions referred to in clause (i) of section 92BA of the Act...

Interplay between Sections 153C and 147 of the Income Tax Act, specifically whether recourse to Section 147 is available when the Assessing Officer (AO) is empowered to...

The court examined whether the application filed by the State Bank of India against the personal guarantor u/s 95 was barred by limitation. It was held that even if no...

Initiation of CIRP - pre-existing dispute - the dispute was neither raised before the issue of section 8 demand notice and also the notice under section 21 of the...

Quick Updates: